Skip to content

The Shawshank Redemption

May 11, 2013

The Shawshank Redemption (1994)
Director: Frank Darabont
Actors: Tim Robbins, Morgan Freeman, Bob Gunton

Shawshank R

Synopsis: Andy Dufresne (Tim Robbins) is sent to jail for two life sentences after the murder of his wife and her lover. In prison, Dufresne befriends canny fellow inmate, Red (Morgan Freeman), and slowly insinuates himself with the guards and warden due to his legal and financial acumen. Despite his terrible situation, Dufresne retains a hope, that is borne out in a daring escape mission.

Review: Epically sentimental and bafflingly overrated, The Shawshank Redemption requires an incredible leniency and sweet tooth from its viewer, plus a willingness to ignore some glaringly obvious plot holes which threaten to tarnish the film’s carefully sugar-coated veneer.

I accept that suspension of disbelief is a pre-requisite for most Hollywood fantasies, but the problem with The Shawshank Redemption’s flooziness is that the film also asks for some investment in the harsh realities of its prison arena to buy the later Andy and Red push for freedom. *Huge spoiler alert* Quite why, when the guards are so busy tearing Andy’s cell to shreds on a regular basis, they’d overlook checking behind his huge film posters is one puzzling oversight, and also the passing of time in the narrative – so key to setting up the catharsis of Andy and Red’s late encounter with freedom – seems bogus. Andy spends the best part of 20 years in jail, and Red upwards of 40 years, yet the sheer physical and spiritual destruction this would wring on the two men is not apparent.

Admittedly, the film does have a sepia-tinted, fable-like quality that is well realised, from Morgan Freeman’s wry, honey-toned voiceover, to the sweetly-lit sequences that reach their apex in Andy’s heroically shot dash for freedom one tempestuous night. Still, it’s in this ending to the film that director Frank Darabont’s ultimate failure and tacky sensibility is truly outed. Instead of leaving implicit how Andy has constructed his prison break and what it will mean for his buddy Red, we get played out an over-extended and odiously demonstrative sequence, showing how Andy actually escaped (surely we got the picture from the earlier ice-pick/film poster sequences). Then we have Red earning his release and following Andy’s path all the way to the Buxton oak tree where Andy has left a letter and bounty to him, then on to the actual Mexican beach where Andy is living out his life. There was no need for Darabont to hold the audience’s hand through all this exposition – it was evident from Andy and Red’s earlier prison exchanges. And rather than show Red reading the letter out and even going to the idyllic Mexican beach, Darabont should have finished on Red elegiacally walking to the Buxton oak tree, leaving the audience to fill in the remaining pieces. (May 2013)

18 Comments leave one →
  1. nightmarewing permalink
    November 4, 2019 11:59 am

    bad review

  2. Conley Brannon permalink
    December 29, 2019 7:01 pm

    It’s not a perfect movie, but this review does not come close to giving the film an adequate review. I’m not a fan of Tim Robbins, but the performances by he and Freeman are two of the best ever. If you know part of being a moviegoer is the ability to suspend disbelief and immerse yourself in the story being created, then I truly don’t understand how you can be so hyper critical of a well acted, well written, and well directed film. I guess you don’t like The Green Mile either because it’s not a realistic prison movie, huh?

  3. todd mcd permalink
    December 31, 2019 10:15 pm

    This “reviewer” needs a different hobby.

  4. Paulo permalink
    February 21, 2020 12:22 am

    😂😂😂 Mr. Navarro is hilarious. Giving tips on how to “improve” the movie.,, funny!!! Stay tuned because next he’s going to give lessons on how to improve Beathoven’s 5th symphony. .

  5. Steve Ray permalink
    March 5, 2020 8:10 pm

    Ohhhh WordPress. I suspect this is a “Notice me!! I’m important!!” review written by Pat. Find a universally loved movie on RT and give it a rotten review so you stand out among the freshly ripe tomatoes and get clicks/traffic.

    Curious people (like me) will then click on the original review to see how any sane person would pan this masterpiece of film making. Sadly and with sincere regret; I will say it worked (I clicked). Fool me once…

    • frank permalink
      July 26, 2020 12:32 am

      You’re exactly right Steve. This is a review equivalent of someone having a sex tape leaked just to get everyone to look at you. Then his big criticism is that the denouement is played out in full detail. Some of us enjoy seeing the happy ending played out because that’s part of the enjoyment of watching the movie. Others want to signal their sophistication and wonderful perception by being bored with seeing the final act played out.

      I was exactly like you, curious to see how some one could have rated this rotten. I was expecting to find an old review that had some specific issue with it. When I saw the date I had a hunch where this was going. I should’ve taken his advice about not needing to see the expected play out and not clicked on the review. Lesson learned.

  6. Mouad benhadda permalink
    March 10, 2020 12:22 am

    You’re talking out of your ass.. Seriously.

  7. March 19, 2020 5:39 pm

    Lol everyone here in 2020 bc it just came out on netflix. Also your review was trash, you can’t give it a bad review just because you would’ve done the ending differently.

  8. bryan freeman permalink
    May 29, 2020 1:19 am

    No film is perfect and should get criticized about somethings,but you are just trying to get attention by crapping on a masterpiece and nit picking parts that you didn’t like,that’s not a review that’s just being a bad “reviewer” who has the sense of a brick wall

  9. July 1, 2020 8:57 pm

    The only weak point in your review is not giving a bit more credit to Robbins and Freeman whose acting saved this film from being even less credible than it is considering the improbabilities: such as the far too young and still fresh faces of Andy and Red after respectively 20 and 40 prison years in harsh conditions, such as trained guards failing to notice the change of shoes, such as failing to check the walls behind the posters, not to mention the absence of nightly cell checks. And why would Andy pause to throw his arms heavenward after crawling out of the sewer? Not very smart, to lose minutes after a prison break, keep your head low and go man! . Or was that just meant as cheap symbolism, the freshness of the rain washing away all the shit of the twenty preceding years?

  10. Matthew Griffiths permalink
    February 15, 2021 10:08 pm

    The only thing baffling is your extremely strange review of one of the best films of all time.

  11. Kenneth Sanders permalink
    May 2, 2021 5:30 am

    This is, by far, the worst movie review I have ever read.

  12. May 7, 2021 6:40 pm

    I completely disagree with your assessment here, it’s a truly amazing film. Sure, it’s not a totally realistic movie, but it doesn’t have to be fully accurate. That’s where you have to suspend your disbelief a little bit. If you want a more realistic film, watch a documentary. As a critic, you’re supposed to put away your biases as much as possible and judge the movie on its merits of filmmaking. The reasons why many people including myself would call it a great movie is because it’s very well-acted, well-written, and well-directed. It’s an excellent film in my book, and possibly one of the best movies I ever seen.

  13. Someone Who Appreciates A Good Movie permalink
    June 11, 2021 1:39 pm

    Dude fuck you.

  14. Hart permalink
    August 18, 2021 5:56 pm

    Just gonna echo what everyone else is saying and point out that you’re a blatantly obvious contrarian and a moron. Sorry you don’t have the ability to enjoy something that is otherwise universally loved.

  15. NICK VOKEY permalink
    August 20, 2021 7:52 pm

    I had to read this review as it’s one of the very few that is causing The Shank to have sub 100% score. RT really needs to vet whom they actually consider to be a “critic”. It’s painfully obvious in the last couple sentences that this guy wants to be a filmmaker but never actually amounted to anything, so instead he’s going to try and tear down other filmmakers that actually followed their dreams. Mr. Nabarro, if you read this, delete this shitty website and go make some films. I’d love to see how your expertise translates on screen.

  16. Greg permalink
    October 14, 2021 11:52 pm

    Before I opened the review for The Shawshank Redemption, I knew that Patrick PJ Nabarro is a robot, instead of a human being. Look at his review about Changeling. Maybe Patrick Nabarro is a 15-year-old high school student who needs to get his priorities straight. I really didn’t think that Ford vs. Ferrari is anything good. But most film critics gave that a positive review. I accept that, and I don’t go about writing that Ford vs. Ferrari is turkey.

  17. Steven permalink
    July 16, 2022 1:22 pm

    Truly impossible to not legitimately laugh out loud at this complete whiff of a review. Though it’s not surprising- go look at this “professional” critic’s reviews. He’s incapable of giving any movie 5/5 (all time classics routinely get 3/5) because he believes it’s his job to point out errors, not celebrate excellent filmmaking. I’d bet his least favorite character of all time is the food critic from Ratatouille. Congratulations on being a blissfully, almost willfully ignorant contrarian. I cannot fathom going to the movies hoping for a poor experience.

Leave a comment